Showing posts with label Sandy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sandy. Show all posts

November 28, 2012

Aerial images of Hurricane Sandy’s destruction

http://darkroom.baltimoresun.com/2012/11/aerial-images-of-sandys-destruction/#1



November 25, 2012

What Could Disappear



UPDATED November 24, 2012

Maps show coastal and low-lying areas that would be permanently flooded, without engineered protection, in three levels of higher seas. Percentages are the portion of dry, habitable land within the city limits of places listed that would be permanently submerged.



Baltimore

 12% flooded
Flooding extends over much of downtown and many waterfront communities, like Dundalk.

Boston

Boston


37% flooded

Cambridge


86% flooded
The downtown island shrinks to mostly Beacon Hill. Many shore communities are flooded.

A Survey of the Flooding in N.Y.C. After the Hurricane




In the days before the arrival of Hurricane Sandy, few people in New York City anticipated the scale of destruction of the storm. The map shows the estimated height reached by floodwaters, which topped 17 feet in some parts, according to surveys and weather data collected by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

November 23, 2012

How resilient is your country?


--
posted by Osnat
https://lms.pratt.edu/file.php/52554/moddata/forum/32840/52034/How_resilient_is_your_country_.pdf
--

Extreme events are on the rise. Governments must implement national and integrated risk-management strategies, says Erwann Michel-Kerjan.

As the United States continues to mop up after Superstorm Sandy, we see again our vulnerability to extreme events. The destruction was massive: US$50 billion in economic losses; large-scale evacuations; thousands of businesses closed in anticipation; and millions of Americans without power for days. But the catastrophe had a silver lining: the way that science was used to improve decision-making. Still, much more is required to make nations truly resilient to extreme events — we need to develop national risk-management strategies.
The United States’ response to Sandy contrasted vividly with that to Hurricane Katrina. In 2005, the inability to foresee and effectively communicate the possible failure of the levee system in New Orleans, and the incapacity of the government to address the basic needs of those affected, surprised the world.

What Do We Really Owe to Future Generations?

--

posted by Osnat
http://verdict.justia.com/2012/11/08/what-do-we-really-owe-to-future-generations
--
The Devastation of Hurricane Sandy Exposes the Fallacy of Focusing on the Federal Government’s Deficit and Debt
In the waning weeks of his doomed Presidential campaign, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney decided that he needed to appeal to undecided young female voters.  His hard-right rhetoric in the Republican primaries seemed to have painted him into a corner, as he had taken extreme positions on abortion, access to contraception, and related matters.  With the election slipping away, he began to try to appeal to the voters who had been turned off by his earlier, emphatic statements that had aligned him with the cultural conservatives at the core of his party.

PROTECTING WORKER & OCCUPANT HEALTH FROM SEWAGE IN FLOODWATERS



http://prattdrn.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/flood-health-hazards-from-sewage-1112.pdf



Catastrophic flooding, like that caused by Hurricane Sandy, can introduce sewage from external sources into the indoor environment. This sewage can pose serious health threats to building occupants and to cleanup and restoration workers.

Sewage is untreated water that contains raw animal or human body fluids or fecal matter or other organic contaminants. During and after Hurricane Sandy, untreated sewage mixed with storm water may have overwhelmed sewers and sewage treatment plants. It then saturated soil and entered flooded buildings and vehicles.

Sewage-contaminated floodwater may remain in a building for hours or  days.  During this time,
extensive penetration and contamination of wood, gypsum, concrete, and other materials may occur.
If sewage is present, it should be assumed that pathogens are  present. Pathogens are disease-causing agents, which can be in the form of bacteria (such as e. coli), viruses, mold spores, or protozoans, and which are normally present in large numbers in sewage wastes. In any flood cleanup project, regardless of  the
source, assume that pathogens are present and take appropriate precautions.


CHEMICAL DISINFECTION
Sewage-affected areas should be washed with a detergent solution, then disinfected and allowed to dry. Cleaning and disinfection are two different processes. Cleaning removes dirt. Disinfection eliminates the pathogens and organisms that were in the sewage or that grew during the period of contamination. Even concrete can be colonized and broken down by microorganisms if it is allowed to remain wet and contaminated by organic matter. If a commercial disinfectant is used, directions must be strictly followed so as to not endanger workers, occupants, or the indoor environment. A household bleach solution is also an effective disinfection agent. It can be made by combining one quarter cup of household bleach to one gallon of water. Bleach should never be used in concentrated form because it can cause severe skin and respiratory harm. Bleach should also never be used with any product that contains ammonia.


PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)
Assume anything touched by sewage is contaminated. In so far as possible, avoid direct skin  contact with floodwaters to minimize the chance  for  infection. Be especially careful of the face and eyes. Protect all cuts, scrapes, and sores. Immediately wash and disinfect any wound that comes in contact with sewage.Cleanup workers should be trained and equipped with appropriate personal protective equipment, including rubber boots or equivalent, rubber gloves, splash-proof goggles, full-body protective clothing, and, if conditions warrant, respirators. An N95 respirator may be adequate. A half face air purifying respirator with hybrid organic vapor/HEPA cartridges may  be more appropriate in some circumstances.


HEALTH-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RESTORATION
The goal is to restore the contaminated area to a condition that eliminates any additional risk of pathogen-caused disease, using methods that protect the health of cleanup workers.

1. Remediation should begin as soon as possible. The longer the contamination is allowed to persist, the greater the potential for microbial growth.

2. Unprotected occupants and workers should be evacuated from the affected areas during the initial stages of decontamination, cleaning, and disinfection (until sewage has been removed and disinfectants applied).

3. During the initial stages of sewage decontamination, cleaning, and disinfection, cleanup workers should be equipped with at least a half face air purifying respirator with hybrid organic vapor/HEPA cartridges, rubber gloves, splash-proof goggles,  rubber boots, protective suits, and hard hats as appropriate.

4. Rapid evacuation of water and rapid drying of impacted materials is essential. Wet extraction systems should be used to remove sewage and water. Dampness and humidity should be Using a respirator, even the right respirator, probably will not provide proper protection unless you have been fit-tested, trained, and qualified to use a respirator. If you are an employee and are required to use a respirator, your employer must provide you with a respirator at no cost, along with annual training, fit-testing, and medical clearance.reduced as much as possible by using the existing mechanical ventilation system, auxiliary fans, and dehumidifiers. Where possible, evaporation of indoor water should be sped up by introducing outside air. Where flooding is extensive, the drying process may require several days or longer to be effective. Drying should be evaluated with a moisture meter and a humidity meter.

5. After  water removal, affected materials should be  decontaminated by spraying with a disinfectant solution.

6. Highly  porous  materials with low cost or replacement value should be  removed  and discarded as soon as possible. High value highly porous materials, such as some rugs, upholstery, and other textiles, should be removed and restored off site.

7. Semi-porous materials such as linoleum, hardboard furniture, and construction materials such as wood and plaster, should be replaced or cleaned and disinfected. If these materials are not  removed or properly disinfected,  they can become reservoirs for growth of microorganisms.

8. Heavy organic matter such as raw sewage and silt must be physically removed in a manner that protects both workers and the indoor environment. This may include the use of shovels, squeegees, septic pump trucks, wet vacuums, and moisture-extraction machines. All tools and machines, especially recovery tanks,  wands, and  hoses, must be  cleaned and disinfected after use.

9. More than one round of  moisture removal, cleaning, and/or disinfection may be warranted.

10. Environmental monitoring should consist of moisture measurements, rather than surface or air sampling for microorganisms. After the restoration process, surveillance of occupants for illness, allergy, and sensitivity may also be used to assess cleanup adequacy.

11. Outdoor areas might need cleanup. Most biological contaminants from sewage on lawns and paved areas will be inactivated within several days from exposure to UV radiation from sunlight. A disinfectant can be used on paved areas. Contamination on grass may be left to degrade naturally. Typically, bacterial numbers on turf are reduced to background levels within 2 to 3 weeks. Depending on the type and amount of chemical contamination present in sewage, soil removal may be warranted in some circumstances.




The Hurricane Aftermath: 10 Ways for Parents and Caregivers to Help Children


http://prattdrn.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/the-hurricane-aftermath-10-ways-for-parents-and-caregivers-to-help-children/


From MercyCorps
With a disaster like the hurricane, adults and children should expect all kinds of feelings: shock, confusion, sadness, grief, anger, loneliness and hopelessness.
This pamphlet provides tips on beginning the healing and emotional recovery processes.
  1. Take care of yourself.
  2. Find something positive in how the child is dealing with the hurricane.
  3. Encourage the child to talk, write or draw about their feelings.
  4. Ask the child what he/she needs.
  5. Be aware of common reactions to trauma.
  6. Be prepared to deal with physical symptoms like stomach aches and headaches.
  7. Children like routines.
  8. Limit the child’s exposure to news about the hurricane.
  9. Provide the child with plenty of time to play.
  10. Help create a sense of safety.

November 19, 2012

Climate Change: Lessons From Ronald Reagan


--
Posted by Milton
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/opinion/sunday/climate-change-lessons-from-ronald-reagan.html?ref=science&_r=0
--


  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • SAVE
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS

THE re-election of President Obama, preceded by the extraordinary damage done by Hurricane Sandy, raises a critical question: In the coming years, might it be possible for the United States to take significant steps to reduce the risks associated with climate change?
Ronald Reagan Library
President Reagan, who favored cost-benefit analysis, in 1984 at his western White House.
A crucial decision during Ronald Reagan’s second term suggests that the answer may well be yes. The Reagan administration was generally skeptical about costly environmental rules, but with respect to protection of the ozone layer, Reagan was an environmentalist hero. Under his leadership, the United States became the prime mover behind the Montreal Protocol, which required the phasing out of ozone-depleting chemicals.
There is a real irony here. Republicans and conservatives had ridiculed scientists who expressed concern about the destruction of the ozone layer. How did Ronald Reagan, of all people, come to favor aggressive regulatory steps and lead the world toward a strong and historic international agreement?
A large part of the answer lies in a tool disliked by many progressives but embraced by Reagan (and Mr. Obama): cost-benefit analysis. Reagan’s economists found that the costs of phasing out ozone-depleting chemicals were a lot lower than the costs of not doing so — largely measured in terms of avoiding cancers that would otherwise occur. Presented with that analysis, Reagan decided that the issue was pretty clear.
Much the same can be said about climate change. Recent reports suggest that the economic cost of Hurricane Sandy could reach $50 billion and that in the current quarter, the hurricane could remove as much as half a percentage point from the nation’s economic growth. The cost of that single hurricane may well be more than five times greater than that of a usual full year’s worth of the most expensive regulations, which ordinarily cost well under $10 billion annually. True, scientists cannot attribute any particular hurricane to greenhouse gas emissions, but climate change is increasing the risk of costly harm from hurricanes and other natural disasters. Economists of diverse viewpoints concur that if the international community entered into a sensible agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the economic benefits would greatly outweigh the costs.
Skeptics have rightly observed that even aggressive regulatory steps by the United States cannot stop climate change. Greenhouse gases stay in the atmosphere for decades, and many nations, especially in the developing world, are contributing growing levels of emissions. For this reason, the unilateral actions of any country will not do what must be done to reduce anticipated warming and the resulting harms. Nonetheless, cost-effective reductions from the United States would help, both in themselves and because they should spur technological changes and regulatory initiatives from other nations.
For the United States, some of the best recent steps serve to save money, promote energy security and reduce air pollution. A good model is provided by rules from the Department of Transportation and the Environmental Protection Agency, widely supported by the automobile industry, which will increase the fuel economy of cars to more than 54 miles per gallon by 2025.
The fuel economy rules will eventually save consumers more than $1.7 trillion, cut United States oil consumption by 12 billion barrels and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by six billion metric tons — more than the total amount of carbon dioxide emitted by the United States in 2010. The monetary benefits of these rules exceed the monetary costs by billions of dollars annually.
In a similar vein, recent rules from the Department of Energy are requiring greater energy efficiency from appliances like refrigerators, washing machines and small motors. For these rules as well, the monetary benefits dwarf the costs, and they include large savings to consumers as well as pollution reductions. There is a lot more to achieve in the area of energy efficiency, especially as technologies advance and continue to transform the once-impossible into the eminently doable.
The electricity sector is responsible for more than a third of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. In this domain, any regulations must be carefully devised, as they were in the case of fuel economy, to ensure that they do not impose unjustified costs, especially in an economically difficult period. But just as in that case, it should be possible to work with affected companies to identify flexible and cost-conscious approaches, producing reductions while minimizing regulatory burdens.
As in the case of the Montreal Protocol, an effective response to climate change requires many nations to act. China is the biggest greenhouse gas emitter on the planet, and it must become a leader in international negotiations, not an obstacle. But smart initiatives from the United States may well be an indispensable precondition for international efforts.
For those who seek to reduce the risks associated with climate change, it is ironic but true that the best precedent comes from a conservative icon. The big question now is whether today’s Republicans will follow Reagan’s example.

Cass R. Sunstein is a professor at Harvard Law School and a former administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.